TL;DR In crypto, pegging means linking the value of one asset to another, like tying a stablecoin's price to the U.S. Dollar at a 1:1 ratio. Pegs exist to reduce volatility, make transactions predictable, and let assets work across different blockchains. However, pegs rely on specific mechanisms to hold their value, and those mechanisms can and have failed spectacularly.
Every time you swap into USDT to sit out a market dip, or use USDC to earn yield on a lending platform, you're relying on a peg. Most crypto users interact with pegged assets daily without giving the mechanics a second thought.
That works fine until a peg breaks. Ask anyone who held TerraUSD in May 2022.
So, what does pegging actually mean in crypto? How do different pegs stay anchored, and what happens when they don't?
What a crypto peg is and why it exists
The different types of pegged assets (it's not just stablecoins)
How pegs are maintained and why some are stronger than others
What depegging looks like in practice
How to think about pegged vs non-pegged crypto
The concept of pegging a currency to something more stable has been around for centuries. Crypto just borrowed the idea.
The most famous example is the Bretton Woods Agreement after World War II. Western nations pegged their currencies to the U.S. Dollar, and the Dollar itself was pegged to gold at $35 per ounce. That system created a predictable framework for global trade that lasted until 1971 when the U.S. dropped the gold standard.
Currency pegs are still everywhere today. The Hong Kong Dollar is pegged to the U.S. Dollar at roughly 7.8:1. The UAE Dirham maintains a fixed dollar rate.
The reasoning behind all of these pegs is identical to the reasoning behind crypto pegging: when the value of your currency swings unpredictably, trade gets messy, planning becomes a nightmare, and people lose confidence. A peg creates an anchor point that everyone can rely on.
A crypto peg ties the value of a digital asset to something else at a set ratio. That "something else" is the reference asset, usually a fiat currency like the U.S. Dollar, a commodity like gold, or another cryptocurrency.
When a token is pegged 1:1 to the dollar, one token should always be worth about $1. The pegged asset tracks the reference asset's value, moving in the same direction by the same amount.
One thing worth flagging early: tracking a value and being backed by that value aren't the same thing. A token can claim a dollar peg without actually holding a dollar in reserve for every token issued. That distinction matters, and it's tripped up a lot of people.
Volatility is the obvious answer, but pegs do more than just smooth out price swings.
They make accounting and pricing straightforward. DeFi protocols need predictable collateral values for lending and borrowing. Try calculating a loan-to-value ratio when your collateral moves 15% between lunch and dinner.
They enable cross-chain functionality. Wrapped tokens like WBTC are pegged representations that let assets function on blockchains they weren't originally built for.
And they create a practical medium of exchange. Nobody's paying their rent in something that might be worth 8% less by the time the payment clears.
These two terms get thrown around interchangeably, but they mean different things.
A pegged cryptocurrency has its value tied to another asset at a defined ratio. The peg is the target price. It's where the token is supposed to trade.
A backed cryptocurrency has actual reserves supporting that value. The backing is what gives the peg credibility.
But a token can be pegged even if it's not fully backed. And that's exactly where risk lives. A peg without proper backing is just a promise, and promises in crypto don't have a great track record.
When you're evaluating any pegged asset, always ask: what's actually behind this peg?
Most people assume a peg is a peg. It's not.
Hard pegging means the mechanism is designed to hold an exact ratio - no flexibility built in. USDC is a clean example. Circle backs every token 1:1 with cash and Treasuries, publishes monthly attestations, and the whole system is built around maintaining that fixed dollar value.
Soft pegging allows a cryptocurrency's value to float within a small range around the target. DAI, a decentralized stablecoin, is soft-pegged to the dollar. It generally hovers near $1 but can drift to $0.99 or $1.01. This flexibility is a feature, not a bug; it's how decentralized systems handle supply and demand without a central authority pulling levers.
Tether is an interesting case. It targets a hard peg of $1 but, in practice, has shown tolerance for movement of up to about 2% before market pressure or arbitrage corrects it. If USDT drifts beyond that range, pay attention; that's historically been an early warning sign.
Feature | Hard Pegging | Soft Pegging |
Price flexibility | Fixed at an exact ratio | Fluctuates within a small range |
Examples | USDC | DAI |
Best for | Trading, payments, remittances | DeFi, decentralized protocols |
Stability level | Highest | High, with minor variations |
Trade-off | Requires substantial reserves | More resilient in decentralized systems |
These are the heavyweights. Fiat-pegged stablecoins tie their value to government-issued currency overwhelmingly the U.S. Dollar, and they're used for everything from trading pairs to international payments to parking cash during a downturn.
Tether (USDT) is the most traded digital asset on earth. Pegged 1:1 to the dollar and backed by U.S. Treasury bills and cash equivalents. Tether's had its controversies, but it remains the dominant stablecoin by trading volume. By a lot.
USD Coin (USDC) takes a more regulation-forward approach. Issued by Circle (which went public in 2025), USDC is backed 1:1 by cash and short-duration Treasuries with regular third-party attestations. Its market cap passed $60 billion in 2025, driven largely by institutional adoption.
Not every peg ties back to fiat. Some tokens are pegged to other cryptocurrencies, letting assets work on blockchains they weren't originally designed for.
Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) is the most well-known example. It's an ERC-20 token on Ethereum, pegged 1:1 to Bitcoin. Actual BTC sits in custody while WBTC tokens are minted against those reserves. This lets Bitcoin holders access Ethereum-based = lending, liquidity pools, and yield farming without selling their BTC.
DAI takes a different approach. It's crypto-collateralized, meaning it's minted through the MakerDAO protocol by depositing crypto (primarily ETH) worth at least 150% of the DAI value created. That over-collateralization absorbs price swings in the underlying crypto. If collateral value drops too far, the system automatically liquidates it to protect the peg.
Some projects peg their tokens to physical commodities, creating a bridge between traditional stores of value and crypto's flexibility.
PAX Gold (PAXG) pegs each token to one fine troy ounce of gold held in London vaults. Want gold exposure without dealing with physical storage, dealer markups, or traditional ETF market hours? PAXG gives you a 24/7 tradeable, blockchain-native option backed by actual bars in Brink's vaults.
A peg is only as good as the mechanism holding it in place. And different mechanisms come with very different risk profiles.
The most straightforward approach for every token issued, an equivalent value is held in reserve.
Fiat-collateralized stablecoins like USDT and USDC hold dollars (or dollar equivalents) with custodians. The reserves sit off-chain in bank accounts and Treasury holdings, and issuers publish periodic attestations to prove the backing exists. Circle does this monthly for USDC. Tether does it quarterly.
Crypto-collateralized stablecoins like DAI keep everything on-chain and visible. Users deposit collateral worth 150%+ of the stablecoins they mint. If the collateral's value drops below a liquidation threshold, smart contracts automatically sell it off to protect the peg. Transparent and decentralized, but capital-inefficient, you need $1.50 in ETH to create $1 of DAI.
No reserves. No collateral. Just code managing supply and demand.
If the token trades above $1, the algorithm mints more tokens to increase supply and push the price down. If it drops below $1, tokens are burned to decrease supply and push the price up.
The theory is elegant, but the practice has been brutal. TerraUSD was the poster child for algorithmic stablecoins until it collapsed in May 2022, wiping out $40 billion. When sell pressure overwhelmed the algorithm, the mint-and-burn mechanism couldn't stabilize the price, and the whole thing spiraled.
Ampleforth (AMPL) takes a different algorithmic approach called rebasing. Instead of minting and burning separate tokens, the protocol adjusts the supply in each holder's wallet daily, proportional to how far the price has drifted from the target.
Own 100 AMPL and the price is 5% above the peg? Tomorrow you'll have 105 AMPL, each worth slightly less. It's a weird concept the first time you see your wallet balance change overnight, but it's fundamentally different from Terra's model.
Algorithmic pegs remain the most fragile type. Without real assets behind them, they're entirely dependent on market confidence, and confidence can evaporate fast.
Some projects have tried splitting the difference. FRAX started as a fractional model partially backed by collateral, partially stabilized algorithmically. After the Terra collapse shook confidence in anything algorithmic, Frax Finance shifted to full collateralization in early 2023. The pivot tells you something about where the market's head is at.
Pegged assets are the plumbing that makes decentralized finance function.
Collateral for loans. Platforms like Aave and Compound let users borrow against stablecoin deposits. Because the collateral maintains a predictable value, both sides of the loan can operate with stable terms. Try doing that with ETH, which drops 20% between when you lend and when the borrower repays.
Yield farming and staking. Stablecoins are the go-to for yield farming because the math stays clean. Earn 5% APY on USDC, and you know roughly what that means in dollar terms. Earn 5% on a volatile token, and it might be worth half as much when you collect.
Liquidity pools. Decentralized exchanges like Uniswap and Curve use pools pairing pegged assets (USDC/ETH, USDC/DAI) to facilitate trading. Curve Finance was built specifically around stablecoin swaps, where maintaining tight pegs across different stablecoins is the whole point.
Cross-chain operations. Wrapped and pegged tokens let value move between blockchains. Without crypto-pegged assets like WBTC, Bitcoin holders couldn't participate in Ethereum's DeFi ecosystem at all.
Depegging is exactly what it sounds like: a pegged asset drifts away from its target price. Small, temporary deviations are totally normal. USDT might trade at $0.998 or $1.002 on any given afternoon and correct itself within hours. That's not a crisis.
The crisis happens when a depeg becomes a death spiral.
The big one. UST's algorithmic mechanism failed under heavy sell pressure. The protocol minted massive amounts of LUNA to restore the peg, which cratered LUNA's value and further destroyed confidence in UST. Within a week, UST went from $1 to pennies. LUNA dropped from $119 to near zero. Combined losses topped $40 billion.
Circle disclosed that $3.3 billion of USDC reserves were stuck in the collapsing Silicon Valley Bank. USDC dropped to $0.87. Because USDC was also the majority collateral backing DAI, DAI depegged too. Both recovered only after the FDIC stepped in to guarantee SVB depositors. Even a well-managed, fiat-collateralized stablecoin wasn't immune to a traditional bank failure.
A more recent and less well-known example that shows how interconnected DeFi has become. xUSD (issued by Stream) collapsed after its external fund manager reported roughly $93 million in asset losses. xUSD dropped from $1 to $0.23. Elixir had lent 68 million USDC to Stream, representing 65% of its deUSD reserves using xUSD as collateral. When xUSD collapsed, deUSD's backing evaporated, triggering its own crash. One failure cascaded into two.
Insufficient reserves. If the issuer doesn't hold enough to back every token, any large-scale redemption attempt can break the peg.
Algorithm failure. Supply-control mechanisms can be overwhelmed by market forces, especially during panic selling. The math works until it doesn't.
External contagion. Problems in traditional finance can bleed into crypto. The USDC/SVB episode proved this isn't theoretical.
Loss of confidence. This is the big one. Pegs run on trust. Once users believe a peg might fail, the rush for the exits becomes self-fulfilling. A bank run on a stablecoin works exactly like a bank run on a bank.
When a peg breaks, the damage spreads.
DeFi loans collateralized with the depegged asset get liquidated. Trading positions margined in stablecoins face unexpected losses. And because DeFi protocols are deeply interconnected, lending to each other, using each other's tokens as collateral, one depegging event can cascade across the entire ecosystem.
Even temporary depegs can cause real financial damage if you're leveraged or if automated systems trigger liquidations before the peg recovers.
Even when pegs are holding steady, pegged assets carry risks that aren't always obvious.
Counterparty risk. Fiat-backed stablecoins require you to trust that the issuer actually holds what they claim. Tether spent years deflecting questions about reserves before improving transparency. Not every issuer will be that forthcoming, and even Tether's improved disclosures are attestations, not full audits.
Transparency gaps. How often are reserves verified? By whom? Is it a proper audit or a point-in-time snapshot? The answers vary wildly between issuers, and most users never check.
Liquidity risk. A peg can hold under normal conditions, but cracks when too many people try to redeem at once. If reserves are locked in illiquid assets (Treasuries that haven't matured, for example), a sudden rush of redemptions can break the peg even when the reserves technically exist.
False sense of security. "Stable" doesn't mean "safe." Holding stablecoins doesn't eliminate risk - it shifts it. Instead of price volatility, you're exposed to mechanism failure, counterparty problems, and regulatory changes. Different risks, not zero risk.
Pegging gives crypto something it badly needs: predictability. Without pegged assets, DeFi couldn't function, cross-chain interoperability would be far more limited, and using crypto for everyday payments would remain impractical for most people.
But a peg isn't a promise carved in stone. It's a mechanism built by people, maintained by reserves or algorithms, and subject to failure when those systems are tested. Understanding what holds a peg together is the difference between informed usage and blind trust.
Check the reserves. Know the mechanism. And never assume "stable" means "risk-free."
Now you understand pegging, but education without execution is just trivia.
Learning Crypto pairs what you learn with live on-chain data, smart-money wallet tracking, and an AI copilot that works from real blockchain transactions. One platform. No guesswork.
It means the token is designed to maintain a value equal to exactly one unit of the asset it's pegged to. A stablecoin pegged 1:1 to the dollar should always trade at or very near $1.
No. Minor deviations are normal. USDT regularly trades at $0.999 or $1.001 and corrects itself quickly. The concern is sustained deviations, which can signal problems with reserves or the stabilization mechanism.
All stablecoins are pegged, but not all pegged crypto is a stablecoin. Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) is pegged 1:1 to Bitcoin's value but isn't designed for price stability — it just represents BTC on Ethereum. Stablecoins specifically aim for a stable, predictable price.
The dollar is still the world's dominant reserve currency and the base unit for most crypto trading pairs. Pegging to USD gives a stablecoin the widest utility for trading, payments, and cross-border transfers. Some stablecoins peg to the Euro, gold, or other assets, but USD-pegged tokens dominate by market cap.
Check the token's live price on CoinGecko or CoinMarketCap. For deeper due diligence, read the issuer's reserve attestation reports. Circle publishes monthly for USDC and quarterly for Tether. On-chain tools like DefiLlama show liquidity pool balances, and lopsided pools are often an early warning sign that something's off.
Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments carry risk; you should always do your own research before making any investment decisions.